Joint Research & Engineering Proposal

IDRCIN

IMBAK Dynamic Canopy Research & Intelligence Network

A dynamic, drone-first rainforest research infrastructure designed to increase scientific visibility without automatically increasing routine human presence beneath the canopy.

In plain words: a drone places sensors and runs fibre cable along the top of the forest canopy, so data flows continuously without people repeatedly going in and out of the forest.

More Knowledge per Unit of Ecological Presence.
01 · Why Imbak Canyon

A high-value forest requires a different research approach.

Rainforest research requires continuous observation, spatial distribution and longitudinal context. More observation should not automatically mean more physical presence.

Continuous Observation

Extend scientific visibility between field visits instead of replacing field researchers.

Distributed Measurement

Move from isolated measurements toward spatially meaningful research coverage.

Minimum Necessary Presence

Deploy only where scientific value justifies ecological presence.

Research determines the technology. Technology does not determine the research.
02 · Research Gap

Continuous visibility between field visits.

Field expeditions, fixed stations, satellites and periodic drone surveys remain essential. IDRCIN fills the gap: continuous, distributed, relocatable and low-presence monitoring.

Field Expedition

Strong judgement and sampling, but episodic and presence-intensive.

Fixed Station

Continuous at one location, but spatially inflexible and persistent.

Remote Survey

Large-area context, but not continuous local measurement.

IDRCIN

Distributed continuous measurements with a temporary, relocatable field layer.

03 · Proposition

A moving scientific grid.

The sensing layer can be retrieved, inspected, calibrated and redeployed as research questions evolve.

MAP
DEPLOY
OBSERVE
DETECT
RETRIEVE
RELOCATE
LEARN
04 · How IDRCIN Works

Map first. Route second. Deploy third.

Reconnaissance, Digital Twin, ecological routing, drone deployment, lightweight sensing, Zonal DAQ, Main Intelligent DAQ and TM Cloud work as one layered research infrastructure.

05 · Canopy Deployment

Extremely lightweight at the research point.

The spool stores fibre, manages controlled payout and houses the built-in quick release. Mechanical load is carried by a dedicated support tether not by the fibre optic line.

IDRCIN canopy deployment concept

One Spool Two Routed Functions

Main uplink to DAQ/HQ and the deployment fibre path both originate from the integrated spool.

Dedicated Support Tether

The tether carries mechanical load. Fibre remains a communications medium.

Solar → Net → Sensor

Ultra-thin solar panel above, retention net in the middle and micro sensor below, with a separate power wire.

06 · Research Capacity

One Point One Sensor.

Redundancy is spatial, not duplicated inside each research point.

4Research Zones
48Active Sensor Points
36Primary Points
12Redundancy / Control
07 · Reliability

Reliability is budgeted from day one.

Phase 2 includes a complete replacement reserve rather than assuming tropical field hardware will never fail.

48Active
+481-to-1 Replacement
+6Emergency Pool
102 total sensor assemblies.
08 · Drone Fleet

Operational redundancy where it matters.

One reconnaissance platform plus two deployment/retrieval-capable aircraft.

01Recon / Mapping

LiDAR, RGB, Digital Twin, route verification and inspection.

02Primary Deployment

Spool deployment, sensor placement, fibre operations and retrieval.

03Backup Deployment

Operational redundancy and retrieval resilience.

09 · Intelligence Architecture

Keep sensors simple. Move intelligence inward.

48 sensors → approximately 4 Zonal DAQs → Main Intelligent DAQ → TM Cloud / HQ.

Zonal DAQ

Acquisition, IoT, local storage, health monitoring, validation and NeuralOps.

Main Intelligent DAQ

Aggregation, cross-zone validation, field storage and sync management.

TM Cloud / HQ

Long-term storage, Digital Twin, dashboards, APIs and analytics.

10 · Presence vs Impact

No monitoring system has zero impact.

IDRCIN is designed for low routine human presence, temporary technology presence, high data continuity and high spatial flexibility.

No Physical Monitoring

Very low presence, low continuous local data.

Conventional Field Monitoring

High scientific value, repeated access may be required.

Permanent Infrastructure

Strong continuity with persistent footprint.

IDRCIN

Temporary, relocatable research layer.

Drone Noise
Rotor Wash
Wildlife Interaction
Fibre Snagging
Weather
Retrieval Disturbance
11 · ESG & Carbon

Less presence, less carbon.

IDRCIN budgets energy and carbon rather than assuming them away.

IDRCIN vs Manual

Fewer human trips

Drone-deployed, retrievable sensing reduces repeated access and persistent footprint.

NeuralOps vs Full AI

Local-first

Validation on-premise; heavy cloud LLM used sparingly, on demand.

Carbon & Energy

Measured, including TNB

Grid electricity for DAQ/HQ budgeted and disclosed, not assumed.

Two Layers of Operational Carbon Reduction

IDRCIN targets carbon reduction at the physical research layer by reducing repeated field mobilisation. NeuralOps targets carbon reduction at the digital intelligence layer by reducing unnecessary AI processing.

“Reduce unnecessary movement in the forest. Reduce unnecessary computation in AI.”
Physical Research Layer

IDRCIN vs Conventional / Manual Monitoring

Preliminary scenario estimate
Manual Monitoring
12 campaigns2 × 4×4
7,200 km × 0.256 = 1,843.2 kg
0
tonnes CO₂e / year
VS
IDRCIN
6 inspections1 × 4×4
drone charging · 180 kWh / yr
460.8 + 97.0 = 557.8 kg
0
tonnes CO₂e / year
≈ 70% LOWERoperational field emissions
Manual
1.84 t
IDRCIN
0.56 t
This comparison focuses on operational field emissions, primarily ground transport and drone electricity. It does not yet include full embodied-carbon lifecycle emissions from manufacturing vehicles, drones, sensors, fibre, batteries or infrastructure. Actual project values should later be replaced with measured vehicle kilometres, fuel litres, drone battery charging kWh, field mission count and retrieval missions.
Digital Intelligence Layer

NeuralOps vs Full-AI Processing

Working workload comparison
Full AI
large AI workload32B tokens
VS
NeuralOps
after routing / detached filtering2.5B tokens
≈ 92.2% LESSvariable AI workload
Whole-system energy model: 30% fixed infrastructure + 70% variable. NeuralOps = 30% + (70% × 2.5/32) = 35.47%.
≈ 64.5% LOWERestimated whole-system compute footprint
Illustrative example based on an existing 360 kg CO₂e annual Full-AI baseline: Full AI ≈ 360 kg; NeuralOps ≈ 128 kg; estimated avoided ≈ 232 kg CO₂e / year. Not externally audited data.
IDRCIN reduces repeated physical mobilisation.
NeuralOps reduces unnecessary AI computation.
More scientific intelligence with less operational overhead efficiency at both the forest edge and the compute layer.
From Estimated → Measured
Physical Layer
  • vehicle kilometres
  • fuel consumption
  • drone battery kWh
  • number of missions
  • human field hours
Digital Layer
  • total tokens
  • model calls
  • server / DAQ electricity
  • cloud workload · storage · network
Future KPI
kg CO₂e / research pointkg CO₂e / month of monitoringkg CO₂e / GB validated datakg CO₂e / research output
Goal: replace preliminary scenario estimates with measured operational ESG data during POC / pilot.
11 · Pilot Programme

Prove it before scaling it.

The programme is stage-gated. Phase 2 proceeds only after jointly agreed POC acceptance criteria are achieved.

Phase 1 · POC
RM500K3–4 Months

Validate core deployment, communication, retrieval and ecological assumptions.

Phase 2 · Full Pilot
RM2.0M12 Months

4 zones, 48 active points, 102 sensor assemblies, 3-aircraft fleet, DAQ, NeuralOps, TM Cloud and full lifecycle validation.

Decision Gate: GO · MODIFY · STOP.
12 · The Ask

RM2.5M potential programme stage gated.

Not an unconditional RM2.5M commitment. RM500K funds the POC. RM2.0M proceeds only after successful validation.

Phase 1
RM500KProof of Concept
GO
MODIFY
STOP
Phase 2
RM2.0M12-Month Full Pilot
13 · Where the RM2M Goes

Funding creates a complete research capability.

Preliminary planning budget. Final values remain subject to detailed design, site assessment, research requirements and vendor quotations.

Drone Fleet, LiDAR & Aerial Systems
RM390,000
102 Sensor Assemblies
RM204,000
Spool, Fibre, Quick Release & Recovery
RM210,000
Zonal/Main DAQ & Connectivity
RM220,000
NeuralOps & Digital Platform
RM200,000
Mapping & Temporal Digital Twin
RM90,000
Field Operations & Logistics
RM150,000
Scientific & Ecological Monitoring
RM120,000
Regulatory, Safety, Insurance & Training
RM70,000
Calibration, QA & Spares
RM70,000
AINNA Systems Integration / PM
RM220,000
Contingency / Field Risk Reserve
RM56,000
TOTAL PHASE 2 BUDGET: RM2,000,000
14 · After Phase 2

Successful Imbak deployment moves directly into steady state.

After the full pilot, Imbak moves directly into an operating steady state with predictable, modest annual planning costs.

~RM1.0MPlanning Baseline / Year

Indicative steady-state range: RM0.8M–RM1.2M annually.

Annual OPEX

Operate · Maintain · Calibrate · Retrieve · Redeploy · Cloud / Data · Research Support · Ecology

15 · Optional Expansion

Expansion is optional not automatic.

A future landscape such as Maliau Basin would be a separate programme with its own mapping, sensor deployment, DAQ infrastructure, ecological baseline and validation.

IMBAKOperational Network
MALIAU?Separate Optional Programme
16 · Governance

Science first. Conservation always.

Scientific, ecological and engineering governance connect through joint steering and explicit GO / MODIFY / STOP authority.

Scientific

Research questions, methods, indicators and sampling design.

Ecological

Restricted zones, disturbance limits, presence budget and stop authority.

Engineering

Drone, spool, fibre, DAQ, NeuralOps, cloud and retrieval.

AINNA
CLICK ME

Site Sections

No section data available yet.

Sites with documented sections will appear here.